Too many Ramayanas- Jaina tellings

The Jaina texts express the feeling that the Hindus have maligned Ravana and made him into a villain. Here is a set of questions that a Jaina text begins by asking- “How can monkeys vanquish the powerful raksasa warriors like Ravana? How can noble men and Jaina worthies like Ravana eat flesh and drink blood? How can Kumbhakarna sleep through six months of the year, and never wake up even though boiling oil was poured into his cars, elephants were made to trample over him, and war trumpets and conches blow around him? They are lies and contrary to reason.”

With these questions in mind King Srenika goes to sage Gautama to have him tell the true story and clear his doubts. Gautama says to him, “I’ll tell you what Jaina wise men say. Ravana is not a demon, he is not a cannibal and a flesh eater. Wrong-thinking poetasters and fools tell these lies.”

He then begins to tell his own version of the story. Obviously, the Jaina Ramayana of Vimalasuri, called Paumacariya, knows the Valmiki form, and proceeds to correct its errors and Hindu extravagances. Like other Jains puranas , this too is a pratipurana , an anti- or counter-purana . The prefix prati , meaning “anti-” or “counter-,” is a favorite Jaina affix! Here Ravana is noble, learned, earns all his magical powers and weapons through tapas, and is a devotee of Jaina masters. To please one of them, he even takes a vow that he will not touch any unwilling woman. He is shaken to his roots when he hears from soothsayers that he will meet his end through a woman, Sita. It is such a Ravana who falls in love with Sita’s beauty, abducts her, tries to win her favors in vain, watches himself fall, and finally dies on the battlefield. In these tellings, he is a great man undone by a passion that he has vowed against but that he cannot resist. Ramayana here is a classical tragedy tale of love and passion.

Here Rama does not even kill Ravana. For Rama is an evolved Jaina soul who has conquered his passions; this is his last birth, so he is loath to kill anything. It is left to Laksmana to kill enemies, and according to Jaina logic it is Laksmana who goes to hell while Rama finds release. Paumacariya is filled with references to Jaina places of pilgrimage, stories about Jaina monks, and Jaina homilies and legends. I found the Jaina tellings to be the most rational. They even rationalize the conception of Ravana as the Ten-headed Demon. When he was born, his mother was given a necklace of nine gems, which she put around his neck. She saw his face reflected in them ninefold and so called him Dasamukha, or the Ten-faced One. The monkeys too are not monkeys but a clan of celestials (vidyadharas ) actually related to Ravana and his family through their great grandfathers. They have monkeys as emblems on their flags: hence the name Vanaras or “monkeys.”

I’ll continue posting more from my research on Ramayanas in the days to come.


3 responses to “Too many Ramayanas- Jaina tellings

  1. A very interesting research… thank you for spreading the wonderful knowledge… I’ll try my best to popularize this link…

  2. It is said that Ravan is called the “One with ten heads” because he has mastered the 4 Veds and 6 Upanishads.
    God knows which version is true. All are fascinating though!

  3. Sourav,
    I heard about Jaina telling but did not know the story. Thanks for bringing that. They have similar story about Krishna’s life with Vasudeva/Prati-vasudeva complexity. One question though:
    “I found the Jaina tellings to be the most rational.”
    When Ravana is a follower of Jaina Masters, why would he go through tapas to attain magical powers and weapons, he should have aimed at self-realization, should he not? He should have practiced non-violence and should not feel any attraction towards way of weapons, would he not? What rationality does that represent? If you say, that is why he is fallen, then how would he be called a noble according to Jaina tradition? Besides, if Lakshmana is the fallen one, why would he go to risk hell to release a woman who is the wife of the brother who feels no need to rescue his wife? Every time I go through one of the prati-puranas, I feel that people has gone through enormous pain to twist some original tale so the resulting story fits some doctrine. It is like prophet of Islam is the 10th Hindu avatar.

    Hindu traditions agree that there was no contemporary scholar more knowledgeable in Shastras than Ravana and no bigger devotee to Siva than him. If such people are demons then demons have to be considered respectable in his time.
    The state of one in the form of rakshasha or human or deva is decided by one’s karma. That being said, much of the purana used a lot of “rupak”, a technique of explaining the complex ideas using mind-arresting themes (mush like using the lingam to represent the destructive power the power that has no shape or associating color with devas or devis to re-present the facets of creation they are required to govern).

Speak up!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s